Journals provide useful information on their websites that you can use when deciding on the usefulness of said journal in your publication strategy.
Requirements of the journal
types of articles accepted, length of articles, referencing styles, submission processes.
Relevant to the scope
always remember to read the scope and aims of the journal as your paper needs to aligned to the journal's scope.
Acceptance/Rejection rates
some journals share the acceptance/rejection rate on the "information for author" pages
the following site may be useful for those in the sciences
SciRev provides researchers the opportunity to share their experiences with the review process of journals.
Turn-around time
an indication of the average turn-around time from submission to publication is listed for open access journals in the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
check the author instructions of a journal's web page or look at some of the published papers, submission and publication times are sometimes included
We recommend keeping these details in a spreadsheet, listing all the requirements for each journal as this can become a reference point, remember to include those that are not suitable as well. A sample spreadsheet can be found on this page.
Use Scopus Sources or SCImago to determine the quartile ranking of the journals. Metrics such as the Source Normalised Impact per Paper (SNIP) may help determine the usefulness of your chosen journals.
DOAJ's mission is to increase the visibility, accessibility, reputation, usage and impact of quality, peer-reviewed, open access scholarly research journals globally, regardless of discipline, geography or language.
Scopus sources is the index to the broad range of peer-reviewed literature and web sources indexed within the Scopus database. Check the CiteScore and ranking for your journal of interest.
A publicly available portal that includes the journals and country scientific indicators developed from the information contained in the Scopus® database. Journals and country rankings can be compared or analysed separately.